| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-06-11
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, L: RESCON
|
| Case Closed |
2012-09-11
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
465342 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
389772 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-07-03 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-07-25 |
| Current Penalty |
1000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-07-25 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b). Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. (a) On or about June 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, as the controlling employer, Roth Construction, Inc. did not ensure that the framing contractor, Ada-Can, Inc. provided fall protection for the owner working on the top plate, on the front side of the residence, placing blocks between trusses at heights of approximately 17 feet. (b) On or about June 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, as the controlling employer, Roth Construction, Inc. did not ensure that the framing contractor, Ada-Can, Inc. provided fall protection for the carpenter, while working on the trusses, near the middle of the residence, at heights of approximately 17 feet above the concrete foundation. Note: Abatement certification is required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260020 B02 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-07-03 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-07-25 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-07-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) (a) On or about June 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, as the controlling employer, Roth Construction, Inc. did not ensure that the framing contractor, Ada-Can, Inc. was providing a safe worksite for employees. Note: Abatement certification is required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260100 A |
| Issuance Date |
2012-07-03 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-07-25 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-07-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) On or about June 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, as the controlling employer, Roth Construction, Inc. did not ensure that the framing contractor, Ada-Can, Inc. provided fall object protection for employees working below those working on the trusses. Note: Abatement certification is required for this item. |
|
|
