|
336517594
|
1032500
|
2012-09-19
|
LANGLEY GULCH I-84 NEW PLYMOUTH EXIT, NEW PLYMOUTH, ID, 83655
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-09-19
|
| Emphasis |
N: CTARGET
|
| Case Closed |
2012-11-26
|
|
|
331108746
|
1032500
|
2012-01-04
|
LANGLEY GULCH- I-84 NEW PLYMOUTH EXT, NAMPA, ID, 83653
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-01-04
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, N: CTARGET
|
| Case Closed |
2012-02-10
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260300 B07 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-02-01 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-02-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29CFR1926.300(b)(7): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: Jobsite: On January 4, 2012, and times prior thereto employees were using a DeWalt bench mounted grinder with the tongue guard set at more than one fourth of an inch. Note: Abatement certification is Not required for this item. |
|
|
|
330294794
|
1032500
|
2011-05-10
|
3806 HIGHWAY 30, NEW PLYMOUTH, ID, 83655
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2011-05-12
|
| Emphasis |
N: CHROME6
|
| Case Closed |
2011-12-27
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
20712 |
| Safety |
Yes |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261126 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2011-06-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-01-09 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
7000.0 |
| Contest Date |
2011-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2011-11-24 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1126(g)(1): Where a hazard was present or was likely to be present from skin or eye contact with chromium (VI), the employer did not provide appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment at no cost to employees, and did not ensure that employees use such clothing and equipment. a) P22 pipe welding: On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide employees with protective clothing for welding on stainless steel pipe with exposures above the permissible exposure limit. b) P91 pipe welding: On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide employees with protective clothing for welding on stainless steel pipe with exposures more than 4 times the permissible exposure limit. Note: Abatement certification and supporting documentation are required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261126 G02 I |
| Issuance Date |
2011-06-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-01-09 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2011-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2011-11-24 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1126(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that employees removed all protective clothing and equipment contaminated with chromium (VI) at the end of the work shift or at the completion of their tasks involving chromium (VI) exposure. a) P22 pipe welding: On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not prevent employees from leaving the worksite while wearing contaminated protective clothing where they had been exposed to hexavalent chromium levels above the permissible exposure limit. b) P91 pipe welding: On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not prevent employees from leaving the worksite while wearing contaminated protective clothing where they had been exposed to hexavalent chromium levels more than 4 times the permissible exposure limit. Note: Abatement certification and supporting documentation are required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261126 G03 I |
| Issuance Date |
2011-06-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-01-09 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
7000.0 |
| Contest Date |
2011-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2011-11-24 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1126(g)(3)(i): The employer did not clean, launder, repair and replace all protective clothing and equipment required by this section as needed to maintain its effectiveness. a) P22 pipe welding: On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not launder employees personal protective clothing to remove hexavalent chromium contamination where exposures were above the permissible exposure limit. b) P91 pipe welding: On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not launder employees personal protective clothing to remove hexavalent chromium contamination where exposures were more than 4 times the permissible exposure limit. Note: Abatement certification and supporting documentation are required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261126 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2011-06-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-01-09 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2011-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2011-11-24 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1126(h)(1): Where protective clothing and equipment was required, the employer did not provide change rooms in conformance with 29 CFR 1926.51 Where skin contact with chromium (VI) occurs, the employer did not provide washing facilities in conformance with 29 CFR 1926.51. a) P22 pipe welding: On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide change rooms or adequate washing facilities for employees with skin exposure to hexavalent chromium fume above the permissible exposure limit. b) P91 pipe welding: On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide change rooms or adequate washing facilities for employees with skin exposure to hexavalent chromium fume more than 4 times the permissible exposure limit. Note: Abatement certification and supporting documentation are required for this item. |
|
|
|
302588926
|
1032500
|
2000-09-11
|
920 LANCASTER ROAD, RATHDRUM, ID, 83858
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Unprog Rel
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2000-09-11
|
| Emphasis |
S: CONSTRUCTION
|
| Case Closed |
2000-09-11
|
|
|
302587662
|
1032500
|
2000-06-29
|
LANCASTER & GREEN FERRY ROADS, RATHDRUM, ID, 83858
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2000-06-29
|
| Emphasis |
S: CONSTRUCTION
|
| Case Closed |
2000-06-29
|
|
