|
345444301
|
1032500
|
2021-07-20
|
1112 N GOVERNMENT WAY, COEUR D ALENE, ID, 83814
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2021-07-20
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-01-26
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
1791424 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 F03 |
| Issuance Date |
2021-09-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2021-10-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4096.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-10-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: (a) On or about July 20, 2021, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have a designated competent person available and capable of identifying existing and/or predictable hazards in the surroundings or working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, and/or dangerous to employees and who has authorization to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them. Employees were working on a mobile scaffold that was not equipped with a complete guard railing system, top rail and did not have all the casters on the wheels locked to prevent inadvertent movement. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2021-09-16 |
| Current Penalty |
1500.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-10-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level. (a) On or about July 20, 2021, and at times prior thereto, the mobile scaffold was not equipped with a top rail and employees were exposed to an approximate 11 foot fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260452 W02 |
| Issuance Date |
2021-09-16 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-10-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2):Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner: (a) On or about July 20, 2021, and at times prior thereto, the supported mobile scaffold did not have all the casters and wheels locked to prevent inadvertent movement, exposing employees to an approximate 11 foot fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260454 A |
| Issuance Date |
2021-09-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2021-10-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-10-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.454(a):The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. (a) On or about July 20, 2021, and at times prior thereto, employees demonstrated a lack of proficiency in safe scaffold use while working on a mobile scaffold that was not sufficiently equipped with a complete guard railing system, lacking the top rail and did not have all the caster wheels locked to prevent inadvertent movement, exposing employees to a potential 11 foot fall. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2021-09-16 |
| Current Penalty |
3000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6827.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-10-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about July 20, 2021, and at times prior thereto, employees involved in construction activities and exposed to a fall hazard(s) from various heights ranging from 11 feet up to 21 feet while working on a residential structure without a means of fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A02 |
| Issuance Date |
2021-09-16 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-10-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii): a) On or about July 20, 2021, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure employees were equipped with adequate and/or effective fall protection training to recognize how to mitigate a fall hazard while working on a roof structure and exposed to fall hazards up to 21 feet to the ground surface below. |
|
|
|
340412493
|
1032500
|
2015-02-11
|
2000 W JOHN LOOP, COEUR D ALENE, ID, 83814
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-02-11
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, N: CTARGET, P: CTARGET
|
| Case Closed |
2015-06-23
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1041274 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260020 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-05-11 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-06-05 |
| Current Penalty |
1250.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-06-10 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
40 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. a) On or about February 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer had not developed and/or implemented an effective accident prevention program to address hazards to which their employees and/or the employees of subcontractors are exposed. Hazards include but are not limited to roofers working without fall protection, improper use of ladders, employees and/or sub-contractors utilizing aerial lifts and not utilizing fall protection equipment and/or not using it correctly. Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260020 B02 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-05-11 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-06-05 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-06-10 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
40 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person: a) On or about February 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not perform effective frequent and regular inspections of site that they controlled to identify, correct and/or eliminate hazards to which their employees and/or the employees of subcontractors were exposed. Hazards include but are not limited to fall protection, overhead hazards, slips, trips and/or falls due to poor housekeeping. Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260453 B02 V |
| Issuance Date |
2015-05-11 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-06-05 |
| Current Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-06-10 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: (a) 2000 W John Loop, Coeur d' Alene, ID: On or about February 11, 2015, an employee without a personal fall arrest system was observed working in a aerial lift and it was extended approximately 17 feet above ground. (b) 2000 W. John Loop, Coeur d' Alene, ID: On or about February 11, 2015, an employee working with a Personal Fall Arrest System (PFAS) attached to a strap anchor and anchored to the top guard rail of the aerial lift and extended approximately 17 feet above ground. Note (1): Abatement certification IS required for this item. Note (2): Note to paragraph (b)(2)(v): As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part 1926.502(d)) that provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e). |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260454 C03 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-05-11 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-06-05 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-06-10 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.454(c)(3): Inadequacies in an employee's work involving scaffolds indicates that the employee has not retained the requisite proficiency. (a) 2000 W John Loop, Coeur d' Alene, ID: On or about February 11, 2015, an employee demonstrated lack of understanding of the requirement to don a personal fall arrest system while working in an aerial lift. (b) 2000 W John Loop, Coeur d' Alene, ID: On or about February 11, 2015, an employee demonstrated lack of understanding and use of the anchor point design and/or purpose and utilized the top rail of the aerial lift basket. Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-05-11 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-06-05 |
| Current Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-06-10 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a) 2000 W John Loop, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho: On or about February 11, 2015, the controlling employer, Edwards-Smith Construction, LLC did not ensure that its sub-contractor Granite Enterprises, Inc., protected their employees while performing roofing activities. Employees were exposed to fall hazards ranging from 12 foot up to heights of 25 feet while working on this 18 in 12 pitch structure. Note) Abatement certification IS NOT required for this item. |
|
|
|
330018003
|
1032500
|
2011-03-24
|
101 SHANNON LN. LOT 7, DOVER, ID, 83825
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2011-03-24
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, L: RESCON, N: CTARGET
|
| Case Closed |
2011-05-11
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2011-04-13 |
| Current Penalty |
1000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1606.5 |
| Final Order |
2011-05-02 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. a) Upper floor, South side of building: On or about March 24, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a 12 foot 1 1/8 inch fall hazard by working around an unprotected wall opening. There was top rail in the opening, but no mid-rail. b) Upper floor, South side of building: On or about March 24, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a 12 foot 1 1/8 inch fall hazard by working around an unprotected window opening. The window sill rose to 36 inches. Note: Abatement certification is not required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001A |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19040007 B03 |
| Issuance Date |
2011-04-13 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2011-05-04 |
| Current Penalty |
500.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1890.0 |
| Final Order |
2011-05-02 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
30 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3): When an injury or illness involves one or more days away from work, the employer did not record the injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log with a check mark in the space for cases involving days away and an entry of the number of calendar days away from work in the number of days column. a) On or about March 24, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not check the box in column H for days away from work injuries for cases 14, 15, and 17 in calendar year 2008. b) On or about March 24, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not check the box in column H for days away from work injuries for cases 1 and 5 in calendar year 2009. c) On or about March 24, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not check the box in column H for days away from work injuries for cases 3 and 6 in calendar year 2010. Note: Abatement certification is required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001B |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19040007 B04 |
| Issuance Date |
2011-04-13 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2011-05-04 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2011-05-02 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
30 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(4): When an injury or illness involves restricted work or job transfer but does not involve death or days away from work, the employer did not record the injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log by placing a check mark in the space for job transfer or restriction and an entry of the number of restricted or transferred days in the restricted workdays column. a) On or about March 24, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not enter the number of days restricted or transferred in cases marked Job transfer or restriction for calendar year 2008. b) On or about March 24, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not enter the number of days restricted or transferred in cases marked Job transfer or restriction for calendar year 2009. c) On or about March 24, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not enter the number of days restricted or transferred in cases marked Job transfer or restriction for calendar year 2010. Note: Abatement certification is required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19040032 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2011-04-13 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2011-05-04 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
630.0 |
| Final Order |
2011-05-02 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
30 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(1): The employer did not review the entries as extensively as necessary to make sure that they were complete and correct. a) On or about March 24, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the OSHA 300A summary for calendar year 2008 was complete and correct in that column H did not match the entries on the summary, and entries with days away also counted as job transfer or restriction. b) On or about March 24, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the OSHA 300A summary for calendar year 2009 was complete and correct in that column I did not match the entries on the summary, and entries with days away also counted as job transfer or restriction. c) On or about March 24, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the OSHA 300A summary for calendar year 2010 was complete and correct in that columns H and I did not match the entries on the summary, and entries with days away also counted as job transfer or restriction. Note: Abatement certification is required for this item. |
|
|
