| Collection |
United States Courts Opinions
|
| SuDoc |
JU 4.15
|
| Court Type |
District
|
| Court Name |
United States District Court District of Idaho
|
| Circuit |
9th
|
| Office Location |
Boise - Southern
|
| Case Type |
civil
|
Parties
| Name |
Ass. Warden McKay
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Baker
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Blades
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Brother
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Chappele
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Christensen
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Contreras
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Frahs
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Held
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Kelsey Howard
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Husk
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Janoushek
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Morgan Kevan
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Klingensmith
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
LAV, LLC
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Morrison
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Olsen
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Sanabaria
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Tramel
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
White
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Zudak
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Kent Williams
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Dietz
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Radzyminski
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
Opinions
| Opinion ID |
USCOURTS-idd-1_20-cv-00008-0
|
| Date |
2020-03-06
|
| Notes |
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY SCREENING JUDGE. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff may proceed on the claims set forth above against Defendants McKay, Chappele, Husk, and Christensen. All other claims against all other Defendants are DISMISSED, and all other Defendants are TERMINATED as parties to this action. Defendants McKay, Chappele, Husk, and Christensen will be allowed to waive service of summons by executing, or having their counsel execute, the Waiver of Service of Summons as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) and returning it to the Court within 30 days. Any amended pleadings must be submitted, along with a motion to amend, within 150 days after entry of this Order. Dispositive motions must be filed no later than 300 days after entry of this Order. Pursuant to General Order 324, this action is hereby returned to the Clerk of Court for random civil case assignment to a presiding judge. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Opinion ID |
USCOURTS-idd-1_20-cv-00008-1
|
| Date |
2022-03-31
|
| Notes |
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Defendants Motion for Summary Dismissal (Dkt. 129) is GRANTED in part and DENIED without prejudice in part for the reasons set forth above. Motions for summary judgment addressing the exhaustion must be filed no later than 30 days after entry of this Order. Plaintiffs Motion to Consider Additional Late Argument (Dkt. 134) isGRANTED to the extent that the argument has been considered. Signed by Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (km)
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Opinion ID |
USCOURTS-idd-1_20-cv-00008-2
|
| Date |
2023-03-31
|
| Notes |
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 159) is GRANTED in part: Claims (5), (8), and (14) are DISMISSED without prejudice, and Claim (15) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Motion is DENIED in part as to all other claims. After consulting with Plaintiff, Defendants shall submit a joint proposed timeline for qualified immunity discovery and summary judgment motions, not to exceed six months in total length (or each side may submit their own if no agreement). If Defendants are not going to assert qualified immunity defenses next, then the parties should determine discovery and dispositive motions deadlines, not to exceed six months in total length, and notify the Court of proposed timeline(s). Signed by Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (km)
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Opinion ID |
USCOURTS-idd-1_20-cv-00008-3
|
| Date |
2024-09-25
|
| Notes |
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - Defendants' Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. 208) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's pleadings, and this entire case, are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing (Dkt. 220) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Copies at No Charge for Appeal (Dkt. 225) is DENIED, given that the appeal has been dismissed (Dkt. 226). In the future, Plaintiff shall direct any such motion to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
