|
336282785
|
1032500
|
2012-09-10
|
316 MOUNTAIN COVE COURT, MCCALL, ID, 83635
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-09-10
|
| Emphasis |
L: RESCON, L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2013-07-09
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
556150 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
628378 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
628379 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-10-31 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-23 |
| Current Penalty |
1000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-11-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b). (a) On or about September 10, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not require employee(s) to use fall protection while working between 11 and 26 feet on a 6:12 pitch roof. Note: Abatement certification is required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-10-31 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-23 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-11-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) On or about September 10, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide employee(s) with adequate fall protection training while working between 11 and 26 feet on a 6:12 pitch roof. Note: Abatement certification is required for this item. |
|
|
|
335807996
|
1032500
|
2012-08-16
|
6813 - 6845 IRVING ST, BOISE, ID, 83706
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-08-16
|
| Emphasis |
L: RESCON, L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2014-03-11
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
510290 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-10-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-31 |
| Current Penalty |
600.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-11-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. (a) East and west side of roof: On or about August 16, 2012 two employees using pneumatic Max nail guns to fix shingles to a residential roof had not been provided safety glasses. Note: Abatement certification IS required. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-10-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-31 |
| Current Penalty |
1000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-11-08 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) On or about August 16, 2012 an employee with no means of fall protection was installing shingles on the eastern side of a residential roof and was exposed to an approximate 21 foot fall hazard to ground below. (b) On or about August 16, 2012 an employee with no means of fall protection was installing shingles on the western side of a residential roof and was exposed to an approximate 19 foot fall hazard to ground below. Note: Abatement certification IS required. |
|
|
